1. 서 론
2. 수상운송기업군 경영성과 평가
2.1 Geometric Fuzzy AHP
Table 1
2.2 Fuzzy PROMETHEE법
- 5단계 : Fuzzy PROMETHEE Ⅱ법으로 각 대체안의 순순 위결정흐름 산출은 식(9)와 같다.
2.3 수상운송기업군 경영성과 평가 모델
3. 수상운송기업군 경영성과 평가모델 구성
3.1 평가항목 추출 및 선정
Table 2
Author | Adoption factors |
---|---|
Shin&Lee.(2017) | Labour (employer numbers), Fund (amount of funds), Variable Expenses (navigation costs) |
Ko&Kil(2011) | Subject, Environment, Resource, Mechanism |
Chon&Ha(2019) | Demand Condition, Production Condition, Related and Support Industry, Industrial Strategy and Policy while the corresponding |
Bank ofKorea(2019) | Concerning Growth, Relationship Ratios of Income and Expenses, concerning Productivity, Gross Value Added |
Han&Lee(2018) | Relationship Ratios of Income and Expenses, Concerning Productivity, Gross Value Added |
Ha etal(2015) | Concerning Growth, Relationship Ratios of Income and Expenses, Stabile/Technical ability |
Table 3
3.2 대상기업군
Table 4
* Overseas passenger transportation services(OP), Overseas cargo transportation services(OC), Coastal passenger transportation services(CP), Coastal cargo transportation services(CT), Other marine transportation services(OM), Inland passenger&cargo transportation services(IPC), Passenger transportation services within port(PT)
4. 수상운송기업군 경영성과 평가
4.1 Fuzzy AHP를 이용한 평가항목 중요도 결정
Table 5
Table 6
4.2 Fuzzy PROMETHEE를 이용한 우선순위 결정
1) 대상기업군 원자료 분석
Table 7
* Overseas passenger transportation services(OP), Overseas cargo transportation services(OC), Coastal passenger transportation services(CP), Coastal cargo transportation services(CT), Other marine transportation services(OM), Inland passenger&cargo transportation services(IPC), Passenger transportation services within port(PT)
2) 정규화
Table 8
* Overseas passenger transportation services(OP), Overseas cargo transportation services(OC), Coastal passenger transportation services(CP), Coastal cargo transportation services(CT), Other marine transportation services(OM), Inland passenger&cargo transportation services(IPC), Passenger transportation services within port(PT)
Table 9
* Overseas passenger transportation services(OP), Overseas cargo transportation services(OC), Coastal passenger transportation services(CP), Coastal cargo transportation services(CT), Other marine transportation services(OM), Inland passenger&cargo transportation services(IPC), Passenger transportation services within port(PT)
3) 순위결정
Table 10
r+ | r- | r | rank | |
---|---|---|---|---|
OP | 4.69 | 3.25 | 1.44 | 3 |
OC | 4.33 | 4.33 | 0.00 | 5 |
CP | 5.05 | 3.61 | 1.44 | 3 |
CT | 5.41 | 3.25 | 2.16 | 2 |
OM | 7.21 | 1.44 | 5.77 | 1 |
IPC | 0.72 | 7.21 | -6.49 | 7 |
PT | 1.80 | 6.13 | -4.33 | 6 |
* Overseas passenger transportation services(OP), Overseas cargo transportation services(OC), Coastal passenger transportation services(CP), Coastal cargo transportation services(CT), Other marine transportation services(OM), Inland passenger&cargo transportation services(IPC), Passenger transportation services within port(PT)
4) Fuzzy PROMETEE Ⅰ을 이용한 최종 순위결정
Table 11
OP | OC | CP | CT | OM | IPC | PT | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OP | I | R | R | R | P | R | R |
OC | P | I | P | P | P | R | R |
CP | R | R | I | P | P | R | R |
CT | R | R | R | I | P | R | R |
OM | R | R | R | R | I | R | R |
IPC | P | P | P | P | P | I | P |
PT | P | P | P | P | P | R | I |
* Overseas passenger transportation services(OP), Overseas cargo transportation services(OC), Coastal passenger transportation services(CP), Coastal cargo transportation services(CT), Other marine transportation services(OM), Inland passenger&cargo transportation services(IPC), Passenger transportation services within port(PT)
5. 결 론
평가항목은 성장성, 생산성, 수익성, 기술성 등 4개의 항 목을 선정하였다.
평가항목의 중요도는 성장성, 생산성, 수익성, 기술성 순 으로 중요도가 높게 나타났다.
평가 결과 대기업 기타해상운송업이 1위, 내항화물수송 업 2위, 내항여객수송업과 외항여객수송업 공동 3위, 외 항화물수송업 5위, 항만내여객운송업 6위, 내륙수상여객 및화물운송업 7위순으로 나타났다.